As CA Fires Burn, Yolo County Declares Climate Emergency
Letter: Jim Provenza has a lifelong progressive record

Pro-DISC letter is misleading

OSHC ARC resolutionBy Roberta Millstein

My fellow Open Space and Habitat Commission (OSHC) member, Patrick Huber, writes to defend the environmental status of the Davis Innovation and Sustainability Campus (DISC) (see Davis Enterprise letter). I respect Patrick; we have worked well together on the commission for a decade. However, although we have agreed on many things, he provides a partial and thus misleading picture of DISC in his letter.

On April 23, 2020, the OSHC voted unanimously on a motion, seconded by Patrick, not to recommend DISC (then called ARC) on the grounds that it would result in a substantial net loss of a noteworthy combination of open space values, including: prime agricultural land, open space on the City’s perimeter, habitat for sensitive species such as burrowing owl and Swainson’s hawk, and views of the Sierra Nevada and Sacramento skyline (see adjacent screenshot).

Patrick maintains that DISC is not sprawl. But a 200-acre expansion of the city limits outside the Mace Curve, dependent on car transportation, is the essence of sprawl. It would be twice as big as The Cannery.  As for future sprawl, the project will increase pressure to develop  nearby peripheral properties such as Shriner’s and the former proposed Covell Village.

Patrick trumpets the native plantings, likening DISC to an ecological restoration project. One look at the land use plan shows that DISC would be mostly pavement, including over 5,600 parking spaces, with a few open space areas sprinkled here and there.  And the developer agreed to only ¼ of the trees recommended by the Tree Commission. 

The mandate of the OSHC is to protect both habitat and farmland.  DISC represents a substantial net loss of both.  It is also important to note that the open space features and habitat, including public access, are City requirements, and DISC does not go above and beyond them.

Finally, Patrick left out the fact that DISC would result in an 8% increase in Davis’s carbon footprint, mostly from the additional 24,000 car trips per day, preventing the City from achieving its goal of carbon neutrality by 2040 (according to the EIR).

DISC is an unmitigated environmental disaster, not a net environmental benefit.  Vote "no" on Measure B.

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)