I delivered this comment to the Davis City Council on 10/19/21 and received a very unprofessional attack from Council Member Carson in return. The comment was given in relation to the "Affordable Housing Ordinance – Extension of Alternative Rental Housing Requirements and Preliminary Scope of Work for an Update of Affordable Rental Housing Requirements" agenda item in which the Council voted to extend the weak interim inclusionary affordable housing ordinance.
On February 6 of 2018 the Davis City Council approved the 2nd attempt at the Nishi project. This project had what has proven to be an unworkable exclusionary affordable housing that forces people accepted into the affordable housing to sharing a room. What’s worse is the combined cost of the two people who share the room is higher than that of market rate single room. Worse there are only 264 affordable beds out of 2200 beds. Beds not units. Most of the market rate is not shared.
The affordable housing in this project is one of the worst, if not the worst included in any project in Davis.
Only a few months before the Sterling project was approved. That project has 41 affordable units not beds units out of the 244 units in the whole project. This project is actually pretty good. We can still do this. This is more like what the goal should look like.
What happened between?
Well the night Nishi was approved, the City council suspended the stronger affordable housing ordinance, and replace it with the weak interim ordinance.
Since then project after project has been approved with less than affordable housing.
Now tonight almost 4 years later you are looking at starting the process. At finally starting the process of putting back in to place a permanent inclusionary housing ordinance.
Never mind all of the YIMBY market rate BS that was thrown at the wall in the Housing Element Committee. This Inclusionary Ordinance is what actually builds affordable housing.
It is a shame it has taken so long to get around to this, but now that we are here. I sure hope the City can get this right and not turn it into just another developer giveaway.
After making this comment tonight, I was attacked by Council Member Dan Carson during the council meeting.
Here are the rough transcripts:
Council Member Carson: May I have a question for the city manager.
Mayor Partida: Sure. Mike?
Carson: The public commenter who just spoke. My recollection is that he campaigned to prevent any of the housing being built and twice filed suits and lost in court on efforts to prevent any of the housing from being built. Is my memory correct?
City Manager Webb: Yes. Matches with my recollection.
Carson: Okay, thank you.
Carson and Webb’s comments are demonstrably false.
I was indeed a plaintiff in a single lawsuit that sought through CEQA to assure that the housing was safe and that the affordable housing policy was legal and fair in the Nishi project - that is very different from "prevent any of the housing from being built." Without enough financial resources to oppose the city we were forced to abandon the litigation. In recent months however, city staff has stated to the planning commission that the affordable housing portion of the Nishi development agreement is not legal and can not be enforced, exactly what the litigation stated and for the same reasons.
By Comparison, Dan Carson has identified himself as part of a West Davis group who sued UC Davis to stop the housing and innovation center west of 113 on the UC Davis campus. While his lawsuit failed to stop the housing, Carson did manage to kill the innovation center that would have been near his home. This innovation center would have been somewhat like a smaller DiSC but would have included involvement from the University.
I felt attacked. What Carson said and what Webb agreed to was a complete distortion and misstatement with the intent to damage my reputation and credibility. It was inappropriate, unprofessional and unbecoming of our council and professional staff.