Ten Ways to Get the Yolo CAAP Back on Track
July 08, 2024
By Juliette Beck, Yolo climate justice advocate
Yolo County recently reduced their draft Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP) - potentially the most important document to guide Yolo County residents, businesses, farmers and decision-makers in our collective response to climate breakdown.
As a member of the Yolo Climate Emergency Coalition that set this planning process in motion, I commend the hard work and thoughtfulness of hundreds of people that contributed their energy, time, thoughts, ideas and hopes. Our goal was - and still is - to mobilize a Just Transition to an ecological, equitable, resilient county.
The draft plan offers a number of important and valuable actions, but the county’s consultants - Dudek - fail to chart the just transition strategies needed to avert catastrophic climate change and the accelerating impacts.
Add your response to the draft CAAP by July 10 through the comment portal at yolocaap.org. Here are some recommended changes:
1) Revise CAAP Methodology to Center Just Transition Pathways
Dudek’s definition of Just Transition is fundamentally flawed and demonstrates a lack of understanding of the Just Transition framework that was called for in the climate resolution that initiated the CAAP process. The county has repeatedly called for a Just Transition approach in all aspects of the development of this CAAP. The county already has an approved General Plan which the county updated in January 2023 to comply with state environmental justice and climate action requirements. This CAAP emerged in response to the need to “build back better” from the pandemic by focusing on transformational solutions to historic, persistent and deepening socio-economic disparities in Yolo County. The American Rescue Plan funding that jump-started this process is specifically earmarked for community members - such as essential workers, BIPOC communities, small business owners, and youth- that were most impacted by the pandemic.
Dudek’s definition of Just Transition is confused and off base right from the start. On page ix they write, “Just Transition moves a community towards climate smart policies and practices without further exacerbating socio-economic disparities.” We called for a CAAP that would be a roadmap for advancing economic, social and environmental equity and justice, not simply maintain the unjust status quo and prevent socio-economic disparities in Yolo County from worsening. This may seem like semantic nit picking but this really is a major design flaw in the CAAP methodology, because it is precisely the existing socio-economic disparities that is making the unfolding climate crisis brutal for marginalized communities. A just transition requires reducing socio-economic disparities and putting these goals at the heart of every climate solution.
Given this fundamental discrepancy in Dudek’s understanding of the purpose of this CAAP, I recommend immediately terminating the Dudek contract and allocating any remaining funds to the Equity and Engagement Technical Advisory Committee which was established by the commission to ensure that equity is advanced in all aspects of the CAAP.
Recommended action: Work with the Equity and Engagement Technical Advisory Committee to revise the CAAP to be a Just Transition Roadmap that drives the systemic transformation necessary for an equitable, ecologically regenerative local economy.
2) Include the Gravel Industry
The omission of the gravel mining industry from the CAAP is a big mistake that undermines the credibility of this plan. Focusing on the carbon footprint of rural Yolo County community members - some of the poorest people in the state -- while excluding the industry with the biggest carbon footprint in terms of lifecycle GHG emissions - is fundamentally unjust and simply bad public policy. The focus on agriculture with no focus on the mining sector will drive inequity in how climate solutions are implemented.
If Clark Pacific’s and Cemex’ cement plants and other major GHG polluters are excluded because they are "stationary sources," regulated elsewhere, this should be discussed openly, with transparency.
Our best chance at getting recalcitrant landowners to implement change is if we make it clear that every sector of the economy must undertake a Just Transition. Excluding the Yolo mining industry is a big mistake that should be corrected in the final draft.
Action: Amend Figure C-13 to include the lands along Cache Creek zoned for industrial gravel mining, which can be seen on the map of past, present and future mining on page 14 of the county’s Off-Channel Mining Plan for Cache Creek.
Action: In Natural and Working Lands Appendix C, include a discussion of the aggregate mining industry and the use of aggregate in perpetuating fossil-fuel intensive road-building, highway construction (such as the 1-80 expansion project), urban sprawl and other sectors of unsustainable development. In other words, both upstream and downstream emission should be evaluated and mitigated.
3) Prioritize Hazard Pay and Financial Relief for Farm Workers
The Woodland Daily Democrat recently reported that Congressman Mike Thompson is pushing for permanent agricultural relief in the farm bill. Farmers receiving federal assistance should be required to pay their workers for wages lost due to climate change-impacted extreme weather as a condition for receiving “permanent relief”.
Action: Add to HC6 Pg. 192 - Require hazard pay for farm workers required to work during extreme weather events and compensate agricultural workers for lost pay due to work lost from climate change induced impacts.
Action: Add - Prioritize building affordable housing for farmworkers.
4) Require Environmentally AND Socially Responsible Purchasing
Procurement - responsible purchasing - is a critical Just Transition pathway. This action should include SOCIALLY and Environmentally Responsible purchasing.
Yolo County has some of the highest levels of inequality in the state. Less than 30% of Yolo County’s businesses are women owned. What percentage of Yolo County government purchasing goes to businesses from historically marginalized communities? This CAAP should set specific equity goals to remedy these significant disparities.
Action: Create action HCP 6b “Develop social justice criteria for county procurement to be included in every RFP. Work with Equity and Engagement TAC to remove barriers in county procurement. Develop socially responsible purchasing policies that expand opportunities for MBE/DBE, veteran-owned, and women-owned local businesses.”
5) Revise Sustainable Development End Goal to “Economic, Social and Ecological Just Transition”
Sustainable Development is a vague term that obscures the fact that Yolo County’s extractivist industries – agriculture, mining – and urban sprawl – are the root causes of the climate crisis. The current model of economic development is fundamentally unsustainable. The whole point of this CAAP was to develop strategies that help us transition our local economy to enterprises that drive equity and generate ecological health and well-being for all rather than more climate pollution, depletion of nature, and inequality. The overarching end goal of the CAAP should be described as “Economic, Social and Ecological Just Transition - not “Sustainable Development.
Action: Revise measure HC8 to be “Inclusive Economic Development”
Add action: Allocate a minimum of 40% of CAAP implementation funding to frontline communities to remedy socio-economic disparities and build resilience.
Add action: Create a county position to support the development of cooperative enterprises and access to land for historically marginalized communities.
6) Remove Working Lands Carbon Credit Scheme
Offset strategies are trumped by economists as “elegant and efficient market-based solutions.” Carbon credit offset schemes may sound good, but in reality, these carbon credit schemes simply don’t work. They reward entrenched polluters that contributed the most to the climate crisis and undermine transformative, just climate solutions.
Offsets are like modern day indulgences that allow the biggest polluters - like Chevron— to buy carbon credits instead of making real reductions in GHG emissions. Carbon markets have had plenty of time to prove their worth, but they have been discredited over and over again. That is why UC Davis is not using offsets in their Fossil Free Plan and neither should Yolo County.
Economists always promise that credits will be “real, additional and verifiable”. But we all watched those “real, additional and verifiable” carbon credits from tree plantations go up in smoke during recent forest fires. A family farmer in Wisconsin recently explained in the Davis Enterprise how California’s cap and trade scheme is backfiring because it rewards big industrial dairies for their “methane capture” at the expense of small, more sustainable dairies.
Furthermore, UC Davis soil experts have raised concerns that the carbon storage capacity in the soil used by industrial agriculture is vastly overestimated. Carbon needs to be stored deep in the soil in order for it to be permanent otherwise the carbon is easily disturbed and returned to the atmosphere. Farmers are deep ripping their land to remove orchards all over the county. Wetland plants, on the other hand, help store carbon deep in the soil and help water penetrate into the aquifer.
We can not afford to be distracted with these kinds of perverse, discredited schemes and focus instead on advancing a just transition to an equitable, ecologically sustainable local economy.
Action: In the Funding and Financing Chapter 7 on page. 216, remove the carbon credit exchange from the CAAP.
7) Prioritize and restore wetland restoration
Wetlands are the most effective ecosystem for drawing down carbon out of the atmosphere and storing it in the soil - and were a thriving part of the Yolo bio-region before settler-colonial farming practices destroyed them along with the lifeways of Wintun people who nurtured and tended them.
Native Californian cultural practitioner Diana Almendariz has shared how tule wetlands actually create an inch of carbon-rich topsoil a year. Traditional ecological stewardship practices cultivated rich, biodiverse wetlands that helped clean the water, enhance biodiversity and facilitated aquifer recharge as deeply-rooted, culturally-significant Native plants helped create underground channels for water to percolate.
Healthy wetlands are also our best line of defense against mosquito vector borne diseases, such as West Nile and Yellow Fever, carried by invasive mosquitos that thrive in degraded lands. Healthy wetlands support birds, bats, fish, dragonflies and other critters that can keep exotic, life-threatening mosquito populations in check. Restoring wetlands are critically important for public health, carbon and water storage, buffering against the extremes of climate change and affirming Wintun homeland culture and stewardship.ACTION: Increase the goal of 100 acres of wetland restoration to 5,000 acres.
8) Incorporate the Yolo County 2021 Sustainability Plan and 30 x 30 Goals
The Yolo County Sustainability Plan approved in 2021 includes a number of key ecological just transition strategies that should be incorporated into the CAAP. The State of California has become a leading champion of the global movement to conserve 30% of land and water by 2030 - referred to as 30 x 30.1 Yolo County should do its part as well. This will entail allowing more surface water to flow in Cache Creek so that it reaches the Sacramento River, restoring marshlands, riparian forests, native grasslands and essential wildlife corridors.
Action: Add restoration and conservation of 30% of Yolo County’s lands and waters by 2030.
9) Center Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Homeland Stewardship
As the Yolo bioregion's original stewards, the Patwin-Wintun people were the first ecologists, biologists, hydrologists, botanists, and land managers.They are the original experts in environmental sustainability. Restoring traditional ecological stewardship and incorporating traditional ecological knowledge into land management is key to restoring ecological and social resilience.
Action: Work with Wintun homeland cultural-practitioners and culture-bearers to restore responsible, just, bioregional ecological stewardship. Technologies and practices such as cultural burning, tending to Native plants, wetland restoration, care for wildlife and land management should be prioritized as critical just transition strategies.
10) Re-establish Climate Action Commission as an independent oversight body
Since the very beginning of the Yolo County Climate Action Commission, I have repeatedly asked the 12-member commission to review the climate impacts of the gravel mining industry and recommend concrete (excuse the pun!) solutions as part of the CAAP process.
Companies like Teichert and Clark Pacific are among the largest campaign contributors to county supervisor elections. It appears the gravel and cement industry’s oversized and unaccounted for carbon footprint is matched by their oversized political influence in Yolo County. Perhaps this explains why the county has repeatedly failed by a longshot to meet their GHG emissions targets. This CAAP provides no explanation of why the county missed their targets.
The exclusion of the mining industry in this draft CAAP underscores the failure of Yolo County to hold themselves accountable to their GHG commitments. This is why we need a commission that can think and act and think independently from the county. Let’s give this CAAP the best chance at success by re-establishing the commission as an independent citizen’s oversight body. Present and future generations are counting on us to get this right.
Action: Re-establish the climate action and adaptation commission as an independent body with its own staffing and budget, capable of enforcing the implementation and monitoring of the CAAP.
_________________
1 EO N-82-20 (October 2020) directs State agencies to deploy nature- based strategies to remove carbon from the atmosphere and store it in California’s natural and working lands. The order sets a goal to conserve 30% of California’s land and coastal waters by 2030 (often referred to as 30x30). To implement EO N-82-20, CNRA developed the Natural and Working Lands Climate Smart Strategy, which defines natural and working landscapes and identifies land management actions that will help achieve carbon neutrality in alignment with AB 1279 and the 2022 Scoping Plan Update for Achieving Carbon Neutrality (CNRA 2022 and CARB 2022)
The beliefs expressed in this type of letter clearly exhibit the problem with mixing environmental and social activism. It also reminds me of an earlier letter, in which it was seemingly claimed that Woodland experiences hotter summers than Davis due to climate change. That claim made absolutely no sense, and (as I recall) motivated Rich Rifkin to point this out as well.
Let's break down some of the claims in this article:
This may seem like semantic nit picking but this really is a major design flaw in the CAAP methodology, because it is precisely the existing socio-economic disparities that is making the unfolding climate crisis brutal for marginalized communities. A just transition requires reducing socio-economic disparities and putting these goals at the heart of every climate solution.
Climate change does not discriminate between rich and poor. There are rich people who purposefully seek out hot locations such as Palm Springs and Scottsdale. Granted, they can usually do so in more comfort than someone with fewer resources, unless (for example) utilities and other costs of living are subsidized based upon income.
The omission of the gravel mining industry from the CAAP is a big mistake that undermines the credibility of this plan. Focusing on the carbon footprint of rural Yolo County community members - some of the poorest people in the state -- while excluding the industry with the biggest carbon footprint in terms of lifecycle GHG emissions - is fundamentally unjust and simply bad public policy. The focus on agriculture with no focus on the mining sector will drive inequity in how climate solutions are implemented.
Agree, regarding the mining industry. On the other hand, doesn't it employ some of the "marginalized" people you refer to in this article?
And yet, you bring up "equity" in regard to agriculture. You seem to be implying that agriculture should "get a pass" on greenhouse gas emissions, simply because they employ poor people.
Do you see the problem with mixing environmental concerns with social justice concerns?
Less than 30% of Yolo County’s businesses are women owned.
If true, so what? Also, are you concerned that the majority of college students are women these days?
What percentage of Yolo County government purchasing goes to businesses from historically marginalized communities? This CAAP should set specific equity goals to remedy these significant disparities.
The logic being that "historically marginalized communities" contribute fewer greenhouse gasses? (Which would directly conflict with the example you provided regarding agriculture.)
Sustainable Development is a vague term that obscures the fact that Yolo County’s extractivist industries – agriculture, mining – and urban sprawl – are the root causes of the climate crisis.
True, but some of the most-strident "equity activists" strive for more of all these things, by claiming that it will increase equity. (Again, this is the problem with tying environmental activism to social justice activism.)
"Pick a side", as they say. It does seem odd that some of the most-strident climate change activists are ALSO development activists.
YIMBYs claim to be concerned about "social justice" and "climate change", as well.
Ultimately, the pursuit of population growth and sprawl is the CAUSE of increased agriculture and mining. For that matter, the switch to electric cars and solar panels is creating an increase in mining.
The current model of economic development is fundamentally unsustainable.
True - and the entire country (and world) works this way. That's why the earth is warming, natural habitat is shrinking, etc.
The whole point of this CAAP was to develop strategies that help us transition our local economy to enterprises that drive equity and generate ecological health and well-being for all rather than more climate pollution, depletion of nature, and inequality. The overarching end goal of the CAAP should be described as “Economic, Social and Ecological Just Transition - not “Sustainable Development".
Agree, regarding "Sustainable Development" - as there is no such thing. That's also ultimately the problem with infill. But there's also no such thing as "Economic, Social, and Ecological Just Transition".
Poor people's poop stinks just like everyone else's. And so does the poop of those who try to make everything about equity on "behalf" of other groups.
As the Yolo bioregion's original stewards, the Patwin-Wintun people were the first ecologists, biologists, hydrologists, botanists, and land managers. They are the original experts in environmental sustainability. Restoring traditional ecological stewardship and incorporating traditional ecological knowledge into land management is key to restoring ecological and social resilience.
Isn't this the group that runs the casino in Capay valley? Which is not only an environmental nightmare, but also a social justice nightmare to boot? (Who do you think goes to casinos?) Of course, the casino does employ some "poor" people itself.
Posted by: Ron O | July 08, 2024 at 09:18 PM
I agree with darn nears everything RO says on this subject. I could have written that.
Posted by: Alan C. Miller | July 09, 2024 at 10:51 AM
Ron wrote:
> It does seem odd that some of the most-strident climate change
> activists are ALSO development activists.
It is also odd that 99% of the "environmental activists" (who will scream at my wife for putting a glass bottle in the "landfill" rather than "recycle" can) will look the other way at the "homeless" throw "tons" of trash and recyclable items (including human waste and used motor oil) on the ground and into Putah Creek, the American and Sacramento Rivers...
P.S. Has anyone ever met a "poor" or "homeless" "climate change activist" or "environmental activist"? I don't know the person who wrote this article but everyone I do know personally that self identifies as a "climate change activist" or "environmental activist" comes from a family with more money than my family had, lives in a bigger house than me and travels by plane WAY more than I ever have...
Posted by: South of Davis | July 10, 2024 at 03:49 PM
SOD, you immediately make this personal, which is your typical MO, rather than addressing the issues that the author raised. So, basically you've said nothing at all, just tried to cast some shade. And you put the author in an impossible situation -- either she reveals her personal finances to you, which are none of your damn business, or you will continue to imply that she is acting from a privileged situation. She does not owe you that information and it is irrelevant in any case. But to answer your question -- yes, I know many environmental activists with low incomes, and they live in Davis. Not sure why you don't.
Posted by: Roberta L. Millstein | July 10, 2024 at 04:48 PM
For what it's worth, I do believe that it takes some amount of "privilege" to be concerned about the environment. Which I believe is SOD's point.
Posted by: Ron O | July 10, 2024 at 04:57 PM
Ron, you can believe that all you want, but in fact it is people with lower incomes who tend to face the worst impacts of climate change, e.g., if they can't afford dwellings with A/C or air filters. And of course, those who are homeless face those impacts even more. Those impacts are not lost on many such people, which is why many of them are activists, despite you and SOD not knowing them. And do not ask me to reveal people's personal financial situations because I won't be giving you information, information that is none of your business and not to be posted publicly unless people choose to share it themselves. But this is what happens when you and SOD make this about the people instead of the issues. You make accusations that cannot and should not be addressed, so you can act like you've scored points when you really haven't. (Your earlier comment on this post at least stuck to the issues rather than the messenger).
Posted by: Roberta L. Millstein | July 10, 2024 at 05:22 PM
"And do not ask me to reveal people's personal financial situations because I won't be giving you information, information that is none of your business and not to be posted publicly unless people choose to share it themselves."
Who asked you for anyone's personal finances? Am I missing something? Both SOD and Ron are speaking in general terms.
Posted by: Keith | July 10, 2024 at 06:26 PM
But this is what happens when you and SOD make this about the people instead of the issues. You make accusations that cannot and should not be addressed, so you can act like you've scored points when you really haven't. (Your earlier comment on this post at least stuck to the issues rather than the messenger).
Roberta: Please point to a comment in which I made this personal.
My initial comment noted that those with fewer resources would tend to experience the effects of climate change more than those with more resources, in the absence of mitigation (e.g., possible subsidies for utilities, etc.).
My subsequent comment (in response to SOD) noted that those who are "privileged" (however that's defined) have the luxury of being concerned (and engaged) regarding environmental issues. Look at any environmental organization to see "who" it consists of. (It's generally not homeless people, or people from what might be described as "crap-hole" cities.) I'm not sure if living in Davis automatically "counts" as being privileged, but that's a discussion we could have I suppose.
It takes resources to be concerned about issues outside of oneself. (Just as it took someone like Rockefeller to preserve the area around Jackson Hole.)
But on a lighter note, doesn't it help that SOD "casted shade" as you put it (at least in regard to climate change)?
My main point, however, is that social justice issues are often mixed with environmental concerns, at the expense of one or the other. (Usually at the expense of the environment.) I provided a pretty clear example of that, in regard to the casino. (The author herself brought up that tribe in her article.)
Posted by: Ron O | July 10, 2024 at 07:29 PM
To all: Please stick to the issues raised by the post, not the people who espouse these views or related views, and not issues that are tangential to the post. I will only post on-topic comments.
Posted by: Roberta L. Millstein | July 10, 2024 at 10:35 PM
I did not see any estimate of the cost off the "Ten Ways to Get the Yolo CAAP Back on Track" I made a rough estimate and it is a huge number. Other than the small number of farm workers that will get extra cash paying for this will hammer the poor that have already been killed with the inflation over the last few years. Like almost everyone I want the environment to be cleaner, but I feel that it is important to do a cost benefit and let voters decide of they want to pay an extra $1,000 year ($83/month) to make the environment a little cleaner and buy and restore 5,000 acres of wetlands). I'm betting that most working class people would rather have the money to pay PG&E to run their AC a little more.
Posted by: South of Davis | July 11, 2024 at 06:56 AM