Davis, Improving Muslim, Arab and Palestinian Human Relations
June 07, 2025
By Scott Steward
When prompted by public comment or by the City Council, the Davis Human Relations Commission (HRC) assigns subcommittees to collect Davis residents feedback on what residents are experiencing, to get direct feedback about Davis residents' experiences, with conflict, discrimination or other relations.
Not surprisingly the Commission has heard much in the way of incidences of Islamic/Palestinian/Arab discrimination and Antisemitism (discrimination against Jews) in the last year and a half. Two subcommittees were formed in late 2024 and remain in place today, the Muslims, Arabs, Palestinians and their Allies (MAPA) subcommittee and the Antisemitism subcommittee. The MAPA report was completed and presented on April 2nd and recommendations from the report were refined and voted on by the commission on April 24th.
The Muslim Arab Palestinians and their allies (MAPA) Human Relations Commission Report is a compilation of “100s of conversations, and review of 100s of videos, photos, and screenshots from social media stories and posts, surveyed residents, DJUSD parents and staff, UCD faculty, staff and students of a relatively even mix of Muslims, Arabs, Palestinians and Ally respondents."
The report is a 91 page representative sample of all the Davis sources and some data from external sources.
All the answers to the questionnaire regarding the discriminatory experiences of Muslim Arab Palestinians and their allies (MAPA) in Davis had to be collected by the end of February 2025, three months ago, it seems like a different reality entirely. The report and the recommendations for sensible inclusive action by the City are doable and reasonable.
The MAPA report is essential in giving space to marginalized voices, but the report continues to draw controversial criticism as was evident at this most recent June 3rd City Council meeting. Most all of those speaking against the report are asking the City Council to disband the Human Resources Commission and to denounce the report.
Listening to the public comment on June 3rd you would have heard approximately 18 in-person and 8 recorded well coordinated messages speak against the HRC MAPA report. Months earlier, you would have heard the emotions of near disbelief from the dozens of Davis Muslim, Arab, and/or Palestinian individuals who shared with the HRC about their fear of speaking publicly and about the relief they felt in being heard for the first time through the MAPA report.
In an encouraging sign of community, just this past Saturday May 31st more than a hundred people showed up for the peaceful and silent "Let Gaza Live" vigil procession that circled the Davis Farmers Market. Although there is no US policy change to go with this show of solidarity and while the focus of the vigil was on delivering food to Gaza, the event had its detractors and these are mostly the same detractors that do not approve of the HRC Subcommittee Muslims, Arabs, Palestinians and Ally respondents report.
We recognize that there are truths from our pro-Israel friends in Davis and truths from our MAPA community. The truth experienced by those in the Jewish community who interpret criticism of Israel as incitement is exacerbated by the times we live in. Additionally, Palestinian family members in the U.S. are in turmoil, as we witness the annihilation of their homes and loved ones in their country of origin. In the US, Muslims, Arabs, and Palestinians have also faced a rise in violence that is institutionally sanctioned and encouraged by persistent tropes and historical inaccuracies, just as Jews are.
Davis's pro-Israel, pro-Palestinian, Arab, Jewish anti-Zionist, Muslim, and allied voices have been heard, thanks to the work of the HRC. Having these voices acknowledged does not necessarily resolve the issues raised—that responsibility falls to all of us within the Davis community. During the report evaluation on April 2nd and at every subsequent HRC meeting, and most every City Council meeting public comment period, every perspective has been given time to be heard.
On April 2nd, after hours of deliberation, the Human Resources Commission voted 7 to 1 in favor of moving the MAPA report recommendations to the City Council (refined and approved on April 24th).
In the middle of the June 3rd Davis City Council, over hour long public comment period, Amir Kohl, in relating his disappointment to the City Council that he could not deliver his full dissent of the MAPA report, as member of the Human Relations Commission, said "So that when you review that report, you also have a diversity of opinions." This appeal for diversity should apply to the report itself, which, as noted in the same June 3rd public comment period to the City Council, "represents the only occasion when Davis Muslim, Arab, and Palestinian voices have been asked about their experiences with discrimination.” Surely, this is a diverse perspective that is needed.
The Davis Muslim, Arab, Palestinian, and allies report is based on what respondents shared, not what the HRC commissioners formulated. Some portions of the 91 pages are uncomfortable and require context, yet they are not lies. As time passes, these truths need to be increasingly understood, not denounced.
Before we delve into the report's recommendations—its most significant part—we must acknowledge the increased dangers we all face three months after the MAPA report's responses were gathered.
Violence against Jews, whether Zionist or otherwise, is unacceptable. A central problem for all of us is that it is exceedingly difficult to argue that violence against Palestinians in Palestine is not tolerated. It is tolerated, and it should not be. Our intolerance for violence must apply universally. Moreover, for our HRC and Council, acknowledging the existence of violence and responding to criticisms of that acknowledgment creates a significant challenge in maintaining civility: our priority must be to recognize and protect one another from harm.
Let's observe an important truth. When it comes to access in Davis, our Zionist and anti-Zionist Jewish community appears to have reasonable access to school administrators, city and county representatives, and city officials. Sometimes those personages don't agree with the group that presents its request for a particular policy to be adopted and this experience of not getting just what you ask for is true for any group in Davis.
Antisemitism is a problem, and more than 50 Davis residents, including some of our elected officials, Jewish, Islamic, Baptist, and School community members, attended the Davis Jews for Justice PARCEO workshop "Curriculum on Antisemitism from a Framework of Collective Liberation" held at the Veterans Memorial building to address that exact problem just before the June 3rd City Council meeting.
The Human Relations Commission has completed assembling and discussing the contents of the MAPA report and the Commission has approved recommendations to improve human relations for the City Council to consider for implementation. These recommendations include:
- Acknowledgement of anti-Muslim, Arab, Palestinian, and allied discrimination in Davis.
- Commitment to free speech, including speech advocating for justice for Palestine and the Palestinian people.
- The City Manager or appropriate city staff will reach out to arrange meeting(s) to review the report and discuss appropriate next steps with DJUSD and UCD administrators.
- City commitment to anti-Palestinian racism and anti-Muslim bias training for staff and council.
- A request from the City for the DJUSD Superintendent to acknowledge and release a statement on MAPA discrimination in Davis.
- A request from the city for the UCD Administration to acknowledge and release a statement on MAPA discrimination in Davis.
The recommendations for combating anti-Semitism could adopt a similar format as we strive to end oppression in all its forms.
Nice even toned unpacking of MAPA project and its context that was missing from public comment at Tuesday Council meeting.
Posted by: Alan Hirsch | June 07, 2025 at 04:01 PM
Scott,
Thank you for this. I appreciate that it is well-written and carefully worded in order to not stir up more negativity, yet makes its point well.
Posted by: Barbara Clutter | June 08, 2025 at 08:36 AM
SO I wonder who leaders/organizers of this non-spontaneous demonstration at council Tuesday were -- they did not self-identify. The item was not on the agenda so this was clearly not spontaneous gathering.
Could they have been the same "small number" of passionate people - per unvetted allegations quoted in MAPA -- that makes others in Davis feel intimidated by their legal but provocative actions?
Posted by: Alan Hirsch | June 08, 2025 at 11:12 AM
Alan Hirsch, what does this mean: "that makes others in Davis feel intimidated by their legal but provocative actions" ? Perhaps you are referring to events that I am not aware of, but isn't it the case that both sides are feeling pretty intimidated at this point?
(I guess it's in MAPA, but I've not read the 90 page document).
Posted by: Roberta L. Millstein | June 08, 2025 at 12:22 PM
[The following is in response to a longer version of AH's comment on the Vanguard, which contains the following additional remarks from AH:
1. I hope David Greenwald when he does a followup, sheds some light on this.
2. Or leaders/organizers could come forward.]
AH say: “SO I wonder who leaders/organizers of this non-spontaneous demonstration at council Tuesday were”
Speaking for myself, I went down there on my own and spoke. I was motivated by having gone to the Human Relations Commission meeting and being appalled by the clown show masquerading as a city advisory committee. I heard about the HRC goings on via an article in the Davis Enterprise.
AH say: “— they did not self-identify.”
I believe everyone – at least most people – said their names. What more are you demanding of those of us who spoke? What groups are they a member of? (a bit invasive) How many people did they call to come here tonight? (not anyone’s business) No one has ever been required during public comment to say anything but their names. The idea that people did not ‘self-identify’ is ludicrous.
Would you also ask that anti-Israel speakers ‘self-identify’ ? Whatever the h*ll that means in your world. If not, why not?
AH say: “The item was not on the agenda so this was clearly not a spontaneous gathering.”
No, it wasn’t on the agenda. There were a bunch of people speaking who showed up on a timely topic because of incidents in our community, in this case the actions of the Human Relations Commission. It is common for large groups of people to show up in Davis when motivated by recent events.
And speaking for myself, as I said above, I did show up ‘spontaneously’. As for the assertation that others were not ‘spontaneous’, that may be true. Yeah, I’ll bet that members of a group of people, targeted people, may have each other’s phone numbers and emails, and may talk to each other; that is kinda the definition of a ‘group’ of people. And I’ll bet that some people called others when they heard about the last HRC meeting. And some of those people may have called or texted other people to let them know, and suggest going to the City Council meeting. It wouldn’t shock me.
And those people may be these ‘leaders’ in your statement. And they should identify themselves, why? Has anyone ever been asked to ‘self-identify’ in this way when speaking at Council? On what planet would anyone? Did you also call for those ‘leaders’ who organized the encampment on campus to ‘self-identify’ ? Did you call for those who organized others to come down to Council on the 6-hour ‘ceasefire’ resolution language meeting to ‘self-identify’ ? On either side? If not, why not?
AH say: “As an sometimes organizer myself, it was an impressive showing. ===== But, could the leaders have been the same “small number” of passionate people”
Or could those who showed up actually be speaking for hundreds of others who didn’t come to the meeting, or are too concerned to publicly, politically identify in today’s Davis political and social atmosphere? Also possible, and also impossible to quantify.
Basically, your argument comes down to: ‘it may have been a lot of people, but they are passionate, so they are probably really are only a small number of people’. Yeah, good luck with that logic serving you in life.
AH say: “– per unvetted allegations quoted in MAPA — that makes others in Davis feel intimidated by their legal but provocative actions?”
Thanks for making that statement clear as mud as to what you are actually talking about. I’m going to infer, having gone to the meetings, that this is in reference to members of the Jewish community capturing vid of anti-Israel protests (many of them masked, indoors, amplified — all actually not legal). While I can not speak for every person with a camera, I know that some members of the community are documenting actions by anti-Israel protestors, both legal and illegal. While some may be annoyed by it and consider it ‘provocative’, that is a judgement or a feeling about being videotaped — and it’s all legal. I can understand why members of the Jewish community want receipts, especially if S goes down in Davis.
AH say: “I hope David Greenwald when he does a followup, sheds some light on this.”
Yeah, hey DG . . . how about figuring out who sent texts to other people asking them to go to the CC meeting and comment. And be sure to get the exact number of people who were texted by each ‘leader’. It could be a ‘conspiracy’ and might be connected to the Jewish Space Laser. Who knows what you might uncover?
AH say: “Or leaders/organizers could come forward.”
I’ll tell you what, AH, you get the organizers of the UC Davis encampment and the organizers of the ‘getting people to the Council meeting to speak for ‘ceasefire’ language’ to ‘come forward’ — OH! OH! and those organized the ‘we don’t want no two state’ amplified masked genocidal chant at the UCD Coffeehouse. You get those, and I’ll see what I can do to find out who sent texts to people to get other people to come to last weeks Council meeting.
You first :-|
Posted by: Alan C. Miller | June 08, 2025 at 04:36 PM