By request, here are links to Davisite articles about Eric Jones’s bid to unseat Mike Thompson in the House, plus his recent donation #s (as best as I can determine them), for easy sharing with friends & on social media. I will try to keep this post updated. – Roberta
*** This is a pinned post — scroll down if you’re on the main page looking for new Davisite articles on other topics
(more…)Posted by
on
in
|
Did you enjoy reading this article? Then subscribe to the Davisite for free and never miss a post again.
Eric Jones is not the candidate he purports to be.
By Paul Gepts
I am particularly disappointed that Congressman Ro Khanna chose to endorse candidate Eric Jones, a Fall 2026 candidate in the California CD04. I am an independent voter and, since April 2026, I have done my homework about the candidates involved, thus covering both the Primary Election (June) and Mid-term Election (November). I attended the town hall meetings of video calls organized by the main candidates (Eric Jones on 09/19 and 10/26; and Mike Thompson 0n 09/01) and the debate between these candidates organized by the LWV in Woodland on 10/08. I also downloaded the candidates’ financial statements to the Federal Election Commission. I have no connection to either campaign, but as a citizen I believe I should become informed and engaged.
Eric Jones is not the candidate he purports to be, a Democratic progressive representing the fourth district of this state. His link to this district is tenuous at best: he owns a house in Napa (in addition to a house in San Francisco), but has never been a candidate for any office at any level in this district. Actually, he voted in San Francisco until 2025. According to FEC filings, most of his funding comes from outside the district. The legal representation of his campaign is provided by the Rutan & Tucker law firm with offices in Newport Beach (47th district) and San Francisco (11th district). When I questioned his link to this district at a town hall meeting, he immediately replied by calling me a “plant”. Let it be very clear that I am not a plant in any way, as mentioned earlier. Instead, Jones’s reaction shows he does not tolerate informed questions and does not have the right temperament to be the representative of a congressional district as diverse as the 4th.
(more…)Posted by
on
in
|
Did you enjoy reading this article? Then subscribe to the Davisite for free and never miss a post again.
By Charlotte Tayler
I was impressed with Roberta Millstein’s recent article on 10 Reasons Not to Vote for Eric Jones and also Sue Greenwald’s incisive and revealing analysis of Eric Jones’ Chilling Foreign Policy Position. I encourage you to read both articles if you have not already
Hopefully, readers are convinced not to vote for Jones, but why vote for Mike Thompson? Below are numerous reasons why you should vote for Mike Thompson.
Thompson has experience. In Congress, experience counts. Whether you like it or not, that’s the “real world” of congressional seniority. Mike Thompson’s years of experience have allowed him to climb the ladder so that, when Democrats take control, he is in line to become of the Chair of the Health Subcommittee on the Ways and Means Committee, where, in his own words, he’ll “help lead Democrats’ efforts to ensure every American has access to health care.”
(more…)Posted by
on
in
|
Did you enjoy reading this article? Then subscribe to the Davisite for free and never miss a post again.
By Melody Fulton
Congressional candidate Eric Jones and I share similarities. We are about the same age, we attended college in the northeast and both are in involved in health care-I went into medicine as a primary care physician and Mr. Jones became a venture capitalist doing health care startups. That is where the similarities end.
While Eric Jones raised hundreds of millions from large financial institutions seeking quick profit from newly formed health care companies, I began work seeing patients daily.
I have received campaign literature from Mr. Jones describing his “success” at lowering health care costs and expanding access to care through his new companies. I find these claims to be far from the truth.
(more…)Posted by
on
in
|
Did you enjoy reading this article? Then subscribe to the Davisite for free and never miss a post again.
By Sue Greenwald
“We need to use our strengths. That’s intelligence and that’s projecting kinetic force all across the world to accomplish our military objectives.” — Eric Jones
“We should be seeking always to mitigate nuclear risk from Iran. But we can do this with tactical strikes every 3 months, every 6 months.” — Eric Jones
So Eric Jones was supposed to be a progressive, but his website said nothing at all about foreign policy, Gaza or the Iran War, or about universal health care. This was my first impression of Eric Jones. After digging a little, I found that Jones was a wealthy venture capitalist with absolutely no political background. No elected office, no appointed position, no activist history – not even a letter to the editor. He had stepped down from his partnership in Dragoneer Investments only a month before he started to run. His long-term partners and a spouse at Dragoneer had set up a Super PAC to support Jones’ candidacy five months before Jones left the firm to run for office. That Super PAC now weighs in at $6 million. I learned that this firm, Dragoneer Investments, had been a big investor in Israeli tech, and had recently moved heavily into AI, with massive investments in Anthropic and Open AI, and into defense industries with major investments in SpaceX and Helsing. And Jones had 756 entries on his FEC filings of individual donations of $3,500 or more – mostly from a network of partners and top executives at high tech companies and their venture capital, hedge fund, and private equity financiers from the tech and financial hubs across the country.
As the weeks and months rolled by, the platform on Eric Jones’ website started to shift, twist, and turn. He soon became opposed to “unnecessary wars”. He was in favor of building AI data centers “here and not abroad”, pre-empting states’ rights to regulate AI, and federal subsidies for AI and AI infrastructure. Then he had “always been against data centers”.
I was concerned about Jones’ foreign policy position, given his public reticence and given the interests of his donors, so I looked forward to the first debate between Jones and Mike Thompson. I wanted to see what Jones would have to say in public, where his donors could hear it.
Eric Jones has finally come out with a specific foreign policy statement, and it’s chilling. During the KCRA debate, Eric Jones declared:
(more…)Posted by
on
in
|
Did you enjoy reading this article? Then subscribe to the Davisite for free and never miss a post again.
By Roberta Millstein
Recently, I’ve had people ask me why it’s so bad that the Eric Jones campaign is spending millions of out-of-district dollars. I was surprised by the question at first, but since a few have asked it, here is my attempt to answer, with links to many of our previous Davisite articles. Please share this article to help get the word out before Nov 3.
10. It raises the bar for political spending. Jones $15M contributions to his campaign — to buy a seat in the House — are record-setting in CA and make his congressional campaign spending one of the highest in the country. It’s a waste of money that could be used on other things and makes it harder for ordinary citizens to run for office. Someone that wasteful of money and resources would not make a prudent candidate.
9. It’s carpet bagging. Jones’s direct donations are mostly large, out-of-district voters, many in high tech and finance. There is no reason to think that these donors have District 4 interests at heart.
8. Jones is supported by a Super PAC, New Leadership Now, of associates from his former firm, Dragoneer, where he was a venture capitalist (not a “businessman” as he likes to call himself) for 12 years, 8 as partner. Jones misrepresented this from the very beginning, claiming not to take corporate PAC money, but to date NLN has spent more than $5 M on Jones’s campaign. Super PACs, which are not supposed to coordinate with campaigns, are typically shady — this one, which has supported only Jones, was formed even before he declared his candidacy and while Jones was still an active partner at Dragoneer.
(more…)Posted by
on
in
|
Did you enjoy reading this article? Then subscribe to the Davisite for free and never miss a post again.
[Note: the following memo was shared for posting on the Davisite]
To: Clancy McConnell, David vanRijn
cc: Yolo County Planning Commission (via Jeff Anderson), Phil Pogledich
From: Alan Pryor, Chair, Sierra Club Yolano Group
Date: October 26, 2026
Re: A Subsequent EIR is Required for the Vulcan Mining Permit Extension instead of just an Addendum to the Previous EIR
___________________________________________________
Executive Summary
Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), when a project changes or new information emerges after an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is already certified, lead agencies must use a specific legal framework to determine if further environmental review is necessary. Yolo County has determined that just an Addendum to the 1998 SEIR for the Syar-Vulcan Madison Mine is required to extend the operating permit for that mine from 2029 to 2049.
We strongly disagree with this determination believing instead that a Subsequent EIR must be prepared. This is because new information has arisen regarding a plethora of more severe adverse environmental impacts that have occurred at the Vulcan and other Cache Creek off-channel mining sites since the 1998 certification of the SEIR for the Vulcan Madison mining project. This new information requires disclosure and analysis in a Subsequent EIR subject to public circulation.
These adverse environmental impacts for which additional information has arisen include widespread unresolved methyl mercury contamination of the deep wet impoundment pits at the Madison mine and other mining sites along Cache Creek site.
(more…)Posted by
on
in
|
Did you enjoy reading this article? Then subscribe to the Davisite for free and never miss a post again.
By Rena Nayyar
I enthusiastically support Willowgrove (Measure W) since it is a well- planned project and our community had much input into its design. One can see the contrast from the problematic Village Farms project by reviewing the project’s documents which are available on our city’s website. A paper copy of the EIR is also at Yolo County Library.
It is clear by the documents that Willowgrove will actually deliver on its promises. In contrast to Village Farms, Willowgrove project will not have impacts on endangered or threatened species, has no toxic concerns, no massive flooding issues, and no Channel A rerouting and associated tree removal. There is safe access thanks to an existing Covell Blvd. undercrossing, so no uncertain construction or costs to the city.
There is a plan to build the 250 deed-restricted affordable housing units early on because the Willowgrove developers have partnered with an affordable housing developer. Willowgrove also has a plan for missing-middle housing and will also bring other amenities which are enforceable because the subdivision map is already developed. This is in contrast to the vague language and loopholes that were in the Village Farms project. Willowgrove also has a sustainability plan showing how it can meet the city’s climate goals. This level of advanced preparation is rare. It guarantees more certainty and means Willowgrove will be ready to build if approved so we can get needed housing soon.
(more…)Did you enjoy reading this article? Then subscribe to the Davisite for free and never miss a post again.
By Bertie Brouhard
He died earlier this month. James Chandler Augustine, my dear friend for most of 75 years. Passed on in Gothenburg, Nebraska. Now no longer suffering from COPD that drained his energy and spirit. He was 80 and failing.
For about a dozen years; ages 6 to 18 we were the tightest of “ buds,” very close coloring each other’s lives, filling in the blanks and spaces that shaped, molded, defined us. His death crowded my aging brain with so many marvelous memories of our youth. This article is not an obituary but hopefully a celebration of his life and perhaps an aid for you in handling the loss of a loved one.
Of course please don’t waste your time reading this if you happen to be one of the fortunate few who have not suffered such loss. If you’re one please email me or at least start wondering when you might join us. My intent is for us both – you the reader (entertained) and me the writer (needing therapy) – to benefit from these mostly true tales of our youth.
(more…)Did you enjoy reading this article? Then subscribe to the Davisite for free and never miss a post again.
By Roberta Millstein
Fellow Davisites, time and time again I promise myself that this is my last post about Eric Jones. And time and time again, he does something more outrageous and I feel obligated to call it out.
Now he’s using the more than $15 million of his venture capitalist money — or perhaps it’s his millions of donated tech oligarch money — to tell even more lies about Thompson. (Remember this lie that Rep Zoe Lofgren had to call out?)
His former campaign staffers are standing by him, though, to correct the record:
(more…)Did you enjoy reading this article? Then subscribe to the Davisite for free and never miss a post again.
By Eileen M. Samitz
Willowgrove is a 232-acre housing project with 1,250 units on Covell Boulevard, across from Harper Junior High School. The project will finally be on the November 3rd ballot as Measure W after many long delays since informal conversations about the project first began over 10 years ago.
The good news is that the project has benefited from much public input, and the resulting project has been worth waiting for. Willowgrove has many amenities and features that make it a desirable project for Davis. It was designed for Davis with a lot of direct input from the community.
The Willowgrove project developers have been upfront and transparent from the beginning. This is the first time in Davis history that a project has offered a completed subdivision map before the Measure J/R/D vote, allowing the community to see the final project design before it is approved. In addition, the agricultural mitigation land has been identified and disclosed to the public before the Measure J/R/D vote. This early disclosure is also a first for Davis and hopefully will set a precedent for future proposals.
(more…)Posted by
on
in
|
Did you enjoy reading this article? Then subscribe to the Davisite for free and never miss a post again.
