Do NOT Change Noise Ordinance Standards nor Formulas
June 21, 2022
Recreation & Parks Commission,
I am highly concerned about the proposal to change the sound standards for the City of Davis. My understanding from articles written by former mayor Joe Krovoza is that standards are in consideration to be changed in terms of duration, levels, and measurement of peaks.
I have aural nerve damage in one ear and so have had to, out of necessity, learn how sound affects the human body. Loud sounds can cause me splitting headaches emanating from the inside of the ear, severe ringing in the ears, internal ear pressure, disorientation, burning, aural misinterpretations, etc. Sound frequency, duration, distance, peak-volume and distortion all factor into the severity of an 'event' as I have come to know them.
Though dependent on particular circumstances, in general shorter bursts of loud sounds are more damaging than longer duration of softer sounds. That is why going with some sort of 'averaging' system would be a tragic mistake. This would ignore the very real damage done by peak sounds. My world-renowned ear doctor from Stanford Ear Clinic would back me up on this. He has coached me on how to live with my condition, which is not treatable.
My ear doctor explains that there is a 'threshold' level at which the noise becomes damaging to hearing (in my case, the threshold is much lower than those with a healthy ear). The PEAK noise is almost always the problem. Therefore, changing the city noise ordinance to consider some AVERAGE measurement as the standard is not only unwise, it is INSANE.
To give an example of how unwise this is, an example everyone can understand - consider train horns. A train horn -- at 100' in front of the horn -- ranges from 96 to 110 db. Even at the low end this is painfully loud, and on the high end can cause ear damage in just a few seconds. But, if you averaged the railroad noise around the tracks over a period of hours, it would show very low AVERAGE noise as over time there are few trains. The PEAK noise is when the damage is done; AVERAGING OVER TIME would FAIL to CATCH the DAMAGING peak sounds.
While I am more bothered by sound than those with healthy hearing, ear disease is rampant and hugely under-diagnosed in this country. There are many people with my condition and many other hearing diseases who are intolerant of various sound conditions. This is not just about an annoyance, it is at times debilitating.
Another thing to consider is that those close to a noise source suffer from the exposure repeatedly and over time. Those adjacent to noise sources are the people who must be considered paramount and above all else. Let's say a nightclub with sub-woofers goes in next door to someone's house. But ON AVERAGE less than 1% of the people in town even hear the noise. The standard must be on how the noise effects those adjacent, not on the fact that 99% of Davis voters never hear it. Another abominable use of 'average' exposure.
I urge the commission, the City, and the Council to retain current noise-ordinance formulas and standards, and reject any attempt to change the noise ordinance to be more allowing of harmful peak noise exposures.
Sincerely,
Alan C. Miller, District 3
Seems like common sense.
As an "alternative" to common sense, the city can attempt to change standards to accommodate a zip line (or any other noisy activity).
I understand that (averaged over time), the venues at rock concerts are also relatively-low. Given that much of the time, no rock concert is occurring.
Pete Townshend's "average" exposure to noise is also probably pretty-low.
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2010/feb/22/the-who-pete-townshend-tinnitus
But even if noise doesn't result in hearing loss, it's often unpleasant.
In a sense, it's sort of like crime - as it's foisted upon others who are the unwilling recipients of it.
Posted by: Ron O | June 21, 2022 at 08:47 PM
The City and the R&P Commission would be well advised to pay close attention to Mr. Miller's arguments above. His condition is not common, but that's no excuse to ignore it. On the contrary, it should be a baseline leading to a clear policy of noise avoidance in all possible circumstances. Everyone is affected by noise. It's a silent killer, especially for people who are repeatedly assaulted by it. The stress response is constant even if, given the brevity of most noise sources, most people wave it away as mere annoyance. They are ignoring it at their peril. If the City really cares about the welfare of Davis' citizens, it should consider it its mission to issue and enforce MORE limitations to noise, not less!
Posted by: J.J. Surbeck | June 22, 2022 at 01:51 AM