ChatGPT is Woke
March 3rd Global Climate Strike

Those 'pesky' City Commissions

Scooby-gang-1969By Roberta Millstein

As a Gen-Xer, I grew up watching a lot of fairly silly cartoons, Scooby-Doo among them.  The plot of Scooby-Doo was pretty much always the same.  The main characters would ask a lot of hard questions, and always end up unmasking the “bad guy,” who would utter a phrase along the lines of “if it weren’t for those pesky kids!”

Reading Item 5 of tonight’s City Council agenda makes me feel like I am in an episode of Scooby-Doo.  Commission meetings are too long, the staff report suggests.  They duplicate efforts, staff implies.

Yet it was the commissions who asked hard questions about DISC.  They asked, for example, about the carbon emissions from the project and better ways to mitigate them.  They asked about the percentage of affordable housing.  They asked about the number of trees and protection for burrowing owls.  They asked about the effect of the project on our downtown.

These were hard questions that were not asked by staff and not asked by the City Council.   They all ended up being issues in the campaign that resulted in voters rejecting the DISC project.

Now, it seems, staff would like to reduce the power of those “pesky” commissions with all of their questions.

Are the commission meetings really too long?  One easy way to make them shorter would be to put a time limit on presentations by developers and others; we can expect that commissioners have read the provided written materials.

Are the commissions really duplicating effort?  As evidence, staff provides a table where different commissions weigh in on the same topic.  What staff fails to mention is that they are looking at different aspects of the same topic.  For example, when Open Space & Habitat looks at a park, it considers habitat values. Rec & Park considers recreational values. Tree Commission looks at the number and species of trees.  Yes, these can overlap, but they are distinctive issues that require distinctive expertise. There is no duplication.

Commissions are treated as pesky by those who have to answer their hard questions, but commissions keep the democratic process in Davis strong.  If we want to revisit the commissions, let’s at least involve them – something that was not done for this meeting.  Our past and present commissioners can provide needed insight into this process.


Alan C. Miller

I suggest getting rid of the City Council instead, and having the commissions run the City. We can elect our commissioners through direct vote, and each commission has a lead that serves on the Council. The only minor issue is how to consolidate like commissions down to five. Advantage also: it gets rid of those pesky districts.

Adele Shaw

Good points. I wish more of Davis' "feel good politics" was grounded in facts and research. Commissions offer logical and important insight instead of impulsive decisions that typically favor profits over democracy.


How about a time limit on the many council member speeches during the meetings? They do tend to bloviate on and on sometimes.

Maybe a two minute limit, you know the same they put on the public speakers?

Roberta L. Millstein

Keith, this was about commission meetings, not council meetings... but I agree 100%. Councilmembers often talk far longer than is necessary to convey their reasons. Sometimes it appears as though they are giving speeches. Then everyone complains how long the meetings go. 🙄

Alan C. Miller

RM: "Sometimes it appears as though they are giving speeches."

Appears as though ?

Sometimes it appears as though Alan Miller is punking the Council with his inane proposals.

Roberta L. Millstein

AM: 😁

Susan Rainier

Making the Living Community Challenge a City Ordinance would align everyone with high sustainability and resilience goals.

If this could be the "Guide" it can be used to make all the committees relevant. It asks us to imagine a community that works like a forest ecosystem.

It's a high level and beautiful way that is very much a follow on to the original Davis progressive general plan that is now being chipped away by status quo development, lack of vision, and random non-leadership that finds residents pesky annoyances.

Perhaps it can also teach collaboration, integration and symbiotic relationships for people and the environment. Why Not? Other communities have done it!

Alan C. Miller

" . . . and random non-leadership that finds residents pesky annoyances."

Guilty, as charged! . . . . . . of being a pesky annoyance to random non-leaders.

Hey, if the foo shˆts . . . and the foo definitely shˆts :-|

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)