Davis’ Leaders Must Stop Protecting Criminals from Law Enforcement and Start Protecting Women from Violence
April 12, 2025
Commentary by Heather Caswell
April 11, 2025
In the spirit of compassion, community and protecting women from violence, Davis needs to change the narrative around prosecuting repeat offending, mentally disturbed criminals who have created the worst safety crisis in our city’s history.
Since last summer, when I had my life threatened twice at my store by a mentally disturbed homeless man who had been arrested and released dozens of times for similar criminal behavior, I have spoken to nearly one hundred Davis women about downtown safety. Almost every one of them had a frightening personal story to relate, like a friend who had a deranged man shouting angry threats for 20 minutes at her and a colleague as they sat outside eating lunch.
My customer Jana Tutan, a lifelong Davis resident and a 73 year old attorney retired from the California State Attorney General's office, told me that she and her friends now go out to eat in Winters to avoid the insecurity they feel as seniors in downtown Davis.
Jana went to UC Davis Law School and has been committed to civil rights her whole career. “I never thought a time would come when I would feel unsafe in downtown Davis in broad daylight,” she told me. “Our rights have been short changed in favor of extending every possible accommodation to a small group of potentially dangerous men.”
Older women, the most physically vulnerable demographic, are often targeted by about ten repeat offending homeless men whose mental illness plays out by bullying and terrorizing people who are weaker than they are. The Artery now has trouble finding women to work their later shifts for fear of being accosted when walking to their cars. Just last month, I learned that the new owner of Tea List was welcomed to my business neighborhood by having her life threatened twice, by the same man, during her first few weeks in business.
Women have fought for decades for the right to be free from domestic abuse, harassment and violence in the home and workplace. More recently, the #MeToo movement raised society’s consciousness about taking women’s safety seriously. Thankfully, “We’ve come a long way, baby.”
But shockingly, we have entered a new era of sexist mansplaining about the fearful experiences that Davis women face by a small number of homeless men who regularly menace our most vulnerable citizens in downtown stores, streets and neighborhoods.
The Vanguard’s David Greenwald leads the way in rationalizing violent threats and intimidation of women as the new “boys will be boys,” when those boys happen to be homeless.
In response to a concerted and successful effort to persuade the city to hire a new downtown beat cop that I led with the Davis Community Vision Alliance (a group of elder women influencers committed to a harmonious, vibrant community), Greenwald wrote a column titled,“Why Is the Council Prioritizing a Beat Cop Downtown over Homeless Service Coordinators?” In it, he describes experiences like mine, of having our lives threatened by menacing, potentially violent, angry men, as "uncomfortable encounters” and “people who feel unsafe.” As opposed to actually experiencing danger. He notes that his “lived experiences" (as a large younger man) has been that “most of the unhoused folks downtown are polite. Yes, there are some who struggle—who yell or act out—but that’s often untreated mental illness, not criminal behavior.”
Greenwald complains that “what we’re seeing is a city ready to invest in law enforcement rather than trained outreach workers. That’s not just a missed opportunity—it’s an abdication of responsibility.”
Greenwald suggests that women like me and my senior citizen customers, who are the victims of relentless menacing behavior by a small number of men, should grin and bear the abuse in the name of “compassion.” He writes that it is easier for council members “to appease wealthy donors and downtown business interests than to stand up and say: This is wrong. This won’t work. We need better. I don’t blame the council for picking their battles. But this is one they needed to fight.”
Shockingly, Lucas Frerichs, the supervisor representing downtown, seems to share Greenwald’s view that protecting a small number of homeless criminals from the consequences of their ILLEGAL ACTIONS against vulnerable members of the public is more important than protecting the safety of the citizens who elected him and whose taxes pay his salary.
During an interview with the Vanguard a few weeks ago, Lucas said, “There’s definitely a perception issue, especially downtown, but I don’t think things are spiraling out of control.” He then went on to blame the police. “If a resident calls for help and the officer responds by yelling at someone experiencing homelessness, that damages trust.”
Terrorized women of Davis do not have a “perception problem,” Lucas. We are not calling the police because we need them to solve the problems of the mentally disturbed or drug addicted person threatening our lives or occupying our back steps. We are calling them because we are EXPERIENCING AN UNSAFE SITUATION, and need law enforcement to do its job. This does not mean criminalizing homelessness. Nor does it mean solving the problems that every homeless person has. What it does mean is protecting all of us, especially women, seniors and children, who are less capable of protecting ourselves from dangerous men, from those who break the law, regardless of whether they are housed or unhoused.
Lucas, like Greenwald and the Davis City Council, need to learn the lesson of the #MeToo movement. And start listening to women.
#
I find it very curious that no one has commented on this. I seldom go downtown these days and wonder: do others see what Heather’s talking about? She’s a longtime community member and has done a lot for good for our community. I take her concerns seriously and would like to know what others, who can speak from firsthand experience, think.
Posted by: Julie | April 13, 2025 at 08:02 PM
My wife and I fell in love with Davis on our first visit two years ago. We met many nice people, including Heather Caswell, who recently posted a pointedly powerful and passionate commentary about lax law enforcement of a problem now corroding the quality of life in this charming city.
My works as a journalist in Philadelphia, Pa – the most impoverished among America’s largest cities – have provided me with professional experiences and personal insights on the issue Ms. Caswell addressed: harassing conduct by some among the unhoused. Mental illness surely compounds conditions of some homeless. However, mental illness should not excuse marauding behaviors especially when targeted against women.
Yes, hiring an officer to patrol downtown areas in Davis will not solve ‘the problem’ of homelessness. However, a purpose of this patrol presence is to deter if not stop the threatening behaviors Ms. Caswell detailed in her commentary. I think it’s deceptive to contend the valid need for compassionate attention to structural issues driving homelessness supersedes the equally valid public safety need for action against the menacing by some that clearly constitutes criminal conduct.
Linn Washington Jr.
Posted by: Linn Washington | April 13, 2025 at 08:05 PM
Julie wrote:
> I find it very curious that no one has commented on this.
Maybe someone did but it got deleted. In this town (and in most media orginizations) people get punished for pointing out the bad behavior of anyone that is homeless, undocumented or POC. When the Davis PD were telling people to "shelter in place" since a shooter was on the loose this weekend and resleased a description of the guns but not the shooter I knew the shooter was "homeless, undocumented or POC". if it was a white guy at a historucally white fraternity party we would have had all the details about the shooter and the party 10 seconds after the shooting (more than 24 hours later Google didn't fin a single description in hundreds of articles).
Linn wrote:
> Yes, hiring an officer to patrol downtown areas in Davis will
> not solve ‘the problem’ of homelessness.
There is a LOT of money that the "homeless industrial complex" won't get if the cops emforce basic laws like they did in the 20th century (1900-1999) and don't allow the homeless to steal, drink in public, sell drugs, illegally camp and turn a new area every month into a mini "superfund" site (without a peep from the local "environmentalists") and scare kids with unlicensed unleashed Pitbulls.
These guys in LA were making good money "feeding the poor":
https://www.cbsnews.com/losangeles/news/heads-of-foodbank-of-southern-california-accused-of-misusing-funds-for-personal-financial-gain/
P.P.S. The what things are headed I bet G Street will look like this in ten years (so Linn won't need to fly to PA or drive to SF to see a "skid row"):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuczQT3rlQU
Posted by: South of Davis | April 13, 2025 at 09:06 PM
No comments have been deleted. You're thinking of the Vangaurd.
Posted by: Colin Walsh | April 13, 2025 at 09:10 PM
I'll never understand why any city lets a minuscule part of its population ruin it for everyone else. Being a big guy I don't have the worries that smaller statured women are confronted with in unsafe environments but I totally understand their frustrations. I don't know why we as a society let this happen. There always seems to be a few bleeding hearts with mega horns who shame and deter others from taking the steps necessary to stop this.
Thank you Heather for having the courage to speak out.
Posted by: Keith | April 14, 2025 at 05:04 AM
"Unposted" by the moderator - is the word that SOD is looking for. That does occur at times, on the Davisite.
Posted by: Ron O | April 14, 2025 at 10:09 AM
Hasn't happened on this thread so let's stick to the subject at hand as it's hell of important.
Posted by: Alan C. Miller | April 14, 2025 at 12:16 PM
Heather, thank you for speaking up. I had a post ready but didn’t hit send. I share all of your concerns. I’ve had a few guys yell at me while walking downtown. There’s a woman who regularly walks around 7th and G street screaming foul language. While waiting at a red light on my bike she came up behind me. Yes, I rode off fast. I’ve had a person come out into the street (3rd st) and threaten to kick my car. I’ve had a woman try to steal my bike locked near Zia’s. I watched her while I was eating at Zia’s. I always looked forward to shopping at the Newsbeat, meeting friends downtown, but no more. I am not going to be harassed anymore in Downtown Davis. I enjoy Woodland and Winters and I don’t have to look over my shoulder anymore.
Posted by: Toni | April 14, 2025 at 03:10 PM
Today I saw open drug dealing (people giving cash and getting baggies) at the corner of 5th & L and last week a crazy lady was blocking traffic and pushing stolen Target shopping carts into cars and bikes that tried to get past her on 8th St. I understand why the cops didn't pull out the pepper spray on campus earlier this month in the video linked below), but I have no idea why they don't seem to have any interest at stopping the "homeless" from stealing bikes, shopping carts and terrorizing more and more people in town every year. I friend has video of local homeless people vandalizing his business doing thousands of dollars in damage, but despite asking the Davis PD to press charges they did nothing (he gave up after asking nicely a couple times since he does not want to escalate so the cops are mad at him).
Every year I spend a lot of time and money trying to help people, but don't have a lot of patience for the newest group of "homeless" that are stealing more than ever and appear to F with people for fun knowing the police will do nothing if they chase people like Toni out of Downtown or steal her bike...
P.S. I am not a "College Fix" reader the site below was just the first to come up with I searched for "protestors walk away with tent on the UC Davis campus while police watch and do nothing):
https://www.thecollegefix.com/masked-uc-davis-protesters-violently-seize-conservative-students-tent-as-cops-watch-assault-reported/
Posted by: South of Davis | April 14, 2025 at 04:42 PM
KO say: "Being a big guy I don't have the worries that smaller statured women are confronted with in unsafe environments but I totally understand their frustrations."
KO say: "I don't know why we as a society let this happen."
Davis enables it, via . . .
"There always seems to be a few bleeding hearts with mega horns who shame and deter others from taking the steps necessary to stop this."
What is amazing to me is the women who, when it goes against their ideology, don't "listen to women's stories", as we were *all* told we should do a few years back? Specifically a few weeks ago at a City Council meeting a college student called in (couldn't make out the name), someone who was promoting funding more services to the homeless, and her strategy to advocate for funding homeless services above funding a downtown beat officer was to say she didn't think downtown was unsafe, and her and her friends felt safe there. This despite women saying they felt unsafe and stories to show why. And at the same meeting Judy Ennis, Executive Director of Davis CAN, said to prioritize the three homeless service items over the two community protection items. She ‘recognized’ the ‘issues’ with neighbors, but . . .
So why are women most ardently denying the lived stories of other women, or in the least denying the importance of allocating funds to help protect women and others in the Core Area of Davis? Is pro-homeless ideology that blinding?
More importantly, the City should never have brought these up as competing items under the umbrella of ‘homeless services’. Community protection is a different matter, dealing with the effects of visible, criminal homeless, and are not in themselves homeless services. The City Council should have made these priorities between such widely diverging categories when making citywide budget decisions, not pitted these needs against each other in a single agenda item.
Posted by: Alan C. Miller | April 17, 2025 at 03:23 PM
I'm tempted to ask someone to define "women", but I think I'll pass.
Posted by: Ron O | April 17, 2025 at 04:00 PM